The token_count
field data type in Elasticsearch is used to store the number of tokens in a text field. It's particularly useful when you need to perform aggregations or sorting based on the number of tokens in a field, without having to recompute this information at query time. This data type is an alternative to using a script to count tokens, which can be less efficient for large-scale operations.
This field type works in conjunction with an analyzer, which is used to tokenize the input text. By default, it uses the standard analyzer, but you can specify a custom analyzer if needed.
Example
PUT my-index
{
"mappings": {
"properties": {
"name": {
"type": "text",
"fields": {
"token_count": {
"type": "token_count",
"analyzer": "standard"
}
}
}
}
}
}
PUT my-index/_doc/1
{
"name": "John Doe"
}
GET my-index/_search
{
"aggs": {
"name_token_count": {
"avg": {
"field": "name.token_count"
}
}
}
}
Common issues or misuses
- Forgetting that
token_count
is based on the analyzer output, not the raw input string length. - Using
token_count
on fields that don't require token counting, which can increase index size unnecessarily. - Not considering the impact of analyzer changes on existing
token_count
fields, as changing the analyzer may affect the token count.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: Can I use token_count
with nested fields?
A: Yes, you can use token_count
with nested fields. It will count the tokens for each nested object separately.
Q: Does token_count
support multi-fields?
A: Yes, token_count
can be used as a multi-field, allowing you to have both the original text field and the token count stored separately.
Q: How does token_count
handle null values?
A: By default, token_count
treats null values as if they had zero tokens. You can change this behavior using the null_value
parameter in the mapping.
Q: Can I update the analyzer for a token_count
field after indexing?
A: Changing the analyzer for an existing token_count
field requires reindexing the data, as the token counts are computed at index time.
Q: Is token_count
more efficient than using a script to count tokens?
A: Yes, token_count
is generally more efficient than using a script, especially for large-scale aggregations or sorting operations, as the count is pre-computed and stored.