Elasticsearch index.store.type Setting

Pulse - Elasticsearch Operations Done Right

On this page

Example and Effects Common Issues and Misuses Do's and Don'ts Frequently Asked Questions

The index.store.type setting in Elasticsearch controls the type of storage implementation used for the index. It determines how Elasticsearch stores and retrieves index data on disk.

  • Default value: "fs" (filesystem)
  • Possible values: "fs", "niofs", "mmapfs", "hybridfs"
  • Recommendations: The default "fs" is suitable for most use cases. Consider alternatives for specific performance requirements or hardware configurations.

Example and Effects

To set the store type for a new index:

PUT /my_index
{
  "settings": {
    "index": {
      "store": {
        "type": "niofs"
      }
    }
  }
}

Changing to "niofs" might improve performance on some systems, particularly those with many concurrent I/O operations. However, the impact can vary depending on the hardware and workload.

Common Issues and Misuses

  • Changing the store type without understanding the implications for your specific hardware and workload.
  • Assuming that a non-default store type will always improve performance.

Do's and Don'ts

Do:

  • Test different store types in a non-production environment before making changes.
  • Monitor performance metrics when changing the store type.
  • Consider your hardware specifications when selecting a store type.

Don't:

  • Change the store type on a production cluster without thorough testing.
  • Assume that one store type is universally better than others.
  • Ignore the potential impact on durability when selecting a store type.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Can I change the index.store.type for an existing index?
A: No, the store type cannot be changed for an existing index. You would need to reindex the data into a new index with the desired store type.

Q: What's the difference between "fs" and "niofs"?
A: "fs" uses the default file system implementation, while "niofs" uses NIO (New I/O) for potentially improved concurrent access performance.

Q: Is "mmapfs" always faster than other store types?
A: Not necessarily. While "mmapfs" can offer better performance in some scenarios, it depends on your specific hardware, workload, and available system memory.

Q: How does the store type affect index recovery time?
A: Different store types can affect recovery time, with some potentially offering faster recovery. However, this can vary based on hardware and index size.

Q: Can using a different store type help with index fragmentation?
A: The store type itself doesn't directly address index fragmentation. Fragmentation is more related to how Elasticsearch manages segments and merges.

Subscribe to the Pulse Newsletter

Get early access to new Pulse features, insightful blogs & exclusive events , webinars, and workshops.